Comments on: lawnchair – a client side JSON document store https://nerdpress.org/2009/11/25/lawnchair-a-client-side-json-document-store/ ...dev, tech problems and solutions. Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:18:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Ivo Bathke https://nerdpress.org/2009/11/25/lawnchair-a-client-side-json-document-store/#comment-76 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:18:50 +0000 https://nerdpress.org/?p=618#comment-76 yap persistentJS ist ebenfalls ein abstractionLayer für die ganzen storage ansätze
lawnchair wahrscheinlich auch.

lass es uns wissen, wenn du das erfolgreich eingesetzt hast

]]> By: Max Girkens https://nerdpress.org/2009/11/25/lawnchair-a-client-side-json-document-store/#comment-75 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:53:13 +0000 https://nerdpress.org/?p=618#comment-75 Das heisst persistJS switcht dann die storage Technologie je nach Verfügbarkeit?
Wie lawnchair das macht, hab ich noch nicht ganz verstanden.

und hier noch eins in der Richtung:

http://github.com/thynctank/Syncopate

das ist aber dann definitiv was für neuere browser.

… is a simple abstraction layer on top of HTML5/Web Database

]]> By: Ivo Bathke https://nerdpress.org/2009/11/25/lawnchair-a-client-side-json-document-store/#comment-74 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:09:44 +0000 https://nerdpress.org/?p=618#comment-74 der hier macht auch sowas:
http://pablotron.org/?cid=1557

da gibts auch ein paar erklärende worte:

Currently the only reliable cross-platform and cross-browser mechanism for storing data on the client side are cookies. Unfortunately, using cookies to store persistent data has several problems:

Size: Cookies are limited to about 4 kilobytes in size.
Bandwidth: Cookies are sent along with every HTTP transaction.
Complexity: Cookies are difficult to manipulate correctly.

Modern web browsers have addressed these issues by adding non-Cookie mechanisms for saving client-side persistent data. Each of these solutions are simpler to use than cookies, can store far more data, and are not transmitted along with HTTP requests. Unfortunately, each browser has addressed the problem in a different and incompatible way

]]>